“[concealed carry is] something that doesn’t cause that many problems.” - Paul Helmke on Hardball
OK, he didn’t say that they might have been wrong, but this is a stunning concession.
“[concealed carry is] something that doesn’t cause that many problems.” - Paul Helmke on Hardball
OK, he didn’t say that they might have been wrong, but this is a stunning concession.
John McCormack interviewed Paul Helmke for an article at The Weekly Standard. One of the most interesting quotes comes towards the end:
Helmke describes the Brady Campaign’s present situation with a football analogy. “The other side had marched the ball down on the 2 yard line . . . but now we got the ball back. The bad news is we’ve got 98 yards to go,” he says. “You don’t throw the Hail Mary pass. . . . You’ve got three downs to get a first down.” Sounds like a game plan. But first the Brady Campaign will need Obama or Clinton to pull off a few trick plays to keep that record on guns well out of sight and win the election in November.
Taking this apart, I would not say that the gun lobby has been able to get “the ball down to the 2 yard line.” While we have managed to make great strides in the past 20 years, handguns are still illegal in D.C. (Hopefully Heller will reverse that) and Chicago, and there are many odious laws still on the books. However, the momentum has clearly been on our side. Right to carry, Castle Doctrine, Katrina bills, the list goes on. As for the gun control side, they did manage to pass microstamping and a partial lead ammo ban in CA, and have made themselves annoying with the ammo coding, but that has gone nowhere. I really don’t know where he gets the idea that they have the ball back. We may be on the verge of a turnover with the coming elections, but the pro gun side still has the ball.
The other question is, what is the hail mary pass? What is the final outcome? They are good about claiming they don’t want an all out ban on guns, but they want to ban “assault weapons,” whatever they are, hand guns, and others. What does that end game look like? They are very good at avoiding that question.
The last point is one I have touched on before, and that it the incremental approach. Mr Helmke talks about having three downs to a first, indicating that they will be more than happy to go for “small” wins, instead of insisting on everything they want right away. We have seen our rights eroded in the past, one small piece at a time, and we need to take a hint from that, and continue to “advance the ball,” even if it is a little bit. That is the approach that has been used on us in the past, we need to learn the lesson that it works, and use it.
Hat tip: Cam & Co
The Paul Helmke at the Brady Campaign has a post about “childproofing” handguns. Let’s take a look:
According to the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention, over 30,000 people were killed with guns in America in 2005. Of those, over 3,000 were children and teenagers, with almost 1,000 16 years-old or younger.
A little bit of research shows that of the 3027 firearms related deaths from the data Mr. Helmke cites, 822 were suicides, 1972 were homicides, 21 were legal intervention, 39 were undetermined, and only 173 were unintentional. While the 173 accidental deaths are certainly tragic, compare that to unintentional deaths from drowning (1120), fire (529), and motor vehicle (6781, more than twice the total number of gun deaths in this age group) and you will see that the percentage of accidental deaths is fairly low.
The dangerous curiosity of some children was tragically demonstrated by an incident in Indianapolis last weekend where a five year-old climbed to the top of a shelf of books in house, found his father’s gun with the magazine removed, but with a round in the chamber, took the gun upstairs to play and then shot and killed his four year-old sister.
If a parent can’t figure out to not leave a loaded handgun where a child can get it, mandating trigger locks isn’t going to cure that.
Another idea that is already the law in New Jersey - and which is now making its way through theCalifornia legislature - is to require that handguns be manufactured to operate only for an authorized user, employing technology already in use with door locks, personal computers, cell phones and credit cards.
While “smart” guns may be the law in New Jersey, no one is currently making them, and the law is not being enforced. Having a proximity lock on a laptop is not the same as a handgun. If the batteries die in my laptop lock, I am not going to be left defenseless. A software bug in my cell phone is not likely to get me killed.
As well as helping to make handguns childproof, this technology can also help make unauthorized handguns useless to gun thieves, gun traffickers, and those who attempt suicide with a gun.
Childproof guns. Anything like the “childproof” pill bottles that only children can seem to get open?