Quote of the Day – Ponzi Edition

January 11, 2009

Anyone with the ability to work a calculator can add up a few figures and realize that Social Security is not fiscally sustainable, and that the whole thing is a huge Ponzi scheme where participation is mandated by the government.  Anyone who can see the numbers and still insists that “Social Security is just fine” either slept through eight-grade math, or doesn’t give a s*** about our kids or grandkids being left without a chair when the music stops in a few decades. – Marko

Exactly.


Now searching causes global warming

January 11, 2009

Breda links a story about the carbon footprint of google searches.

So now searching causes global warming.

If you’ve checked the local weather, 2 of the next 5 days are forecast to have highs requiring a 2nd digit.

Go search. Do it now.


Doing everything

January 11, 2009

The following comment was left at Snowflakes in Hell:

“Bitter and I are in Arlington. NRA Board Meeting are going on right now. We don’t have much of an agenda, except for discussing some details of the Second Amendment Blog Bash.”

Yeah,no agenda you say? You have a chance to do something big with the Holder Debacle while you’re THERE,and show your leadership abilities.

And all you care about is the “blog Bash” later in the year.

I would never call you a coward because I don’t know you,but man,you sure do know how to disappoint..

Personally,you showed your true colors to me when you disarmed to be in the same room with McCain at the “NRA Convention.”

Be well…..

Yeah Sebastian, why didn’t you do something about the Holder debacle, and while you were at it, make sure they get right on overturning the NFA, Hughes, and all of GCA ’68. And they really aren’t doing enough to recruit new people into the shooting sports, a multi-million dollar ad campaign would do wonders for that, make sure they get that going right away.

The answer as to why he didn’t address all of these issues, and why the NRA is doing so “badly” on them, is very simple. Resources. 

Sebastian & Bitter had the resource of a certain amount of time that they had working with certain people, and a limited amount of help they could get from those people. They made a decision on how to use their resources. Was it the best use? That could be argued either way with valid points, depending on your point of view, but it was a worthy use of their resources.

Groups like the NRA have a limited amount of money, manpower, political capitol, etc. with which to work. They have used it on things like concealed carry, the Heller case, and others. They don’t have an unlimited amount of these resources, and have to prioritize. 

Why doesn’t [insert group or person here] do more about [insert pet cause here]? Because they only have so much to work with. Because someone else’s pet cause was chosen, and they don’t have the resources for yours. Because there is a lot of work to do, and not nearly enough people and money to do it with.

Instead of cutting down the people who are working on your side, expend some of your resources towards your cause. Send some money, spend some time, make some phone calls, or write some letters. And if you are doing all that already, you probably understand that there are some things that you don’t get to, because there are only so many hours in the day, and only so many dollars in the bank. Everyone is in that boat. 

And just because a person or a group is not devoting their resources to your cause doesn’t mean that they oppose you, or are sellouts, or any of that, it often means that they have a slightly different order of priorities.


Sweet!

January 10, 2009

Half Price Books had a stack of copies of Freedomnomics.

I read a copy from the library a while back, but needed a copy.

If you haven’t read it, Freedomnomics was written largely as a rebuttal of Freakonomics, (which I have, but need to read like about a hundred other books, along with the thousands I don’t have but need to read) which some people think makes some of it read a little forced, but also is a defense of the free market, with a lot of answers to the claims of detractors. 

Well worth reading, as John Lott usually is.

I will probably read through it again, and provide a more thorough review then.


Quote of the Day – Daydream Edition

January 10, 2009

Sadly for us, Sarah Palin’s are few and far between.  Even if you hate her politics, you’ve got to admire the fact that she came along and tossed a good-old-boys network onto their frozen a****s, to be stranded in the permafrost and eaten by wolves.

(That’s how I like to imagine it, anyway.  Don’t you spoil my daydream!!) – Lissa


Quote of the Day – Common Edition

January 9, 2009

…and that’s assuming 6.5 ammo, which is actually fairly plentiful by comparison to 7.35 Carcano. (This is like saying snow cones are common in hell in comparison to banana daiquiris.) – Tam


Speed Strips

January 8, 2009

I got my Speed Strips, and so far they are the one big thing I hoped they would be: a speed loading device for both of my revolvers. If I was carrying, I would only have 5 cartridges in the strip(s), they can also be loaded with 6, which loads the K-frame in 3 pairs, or the J-frame in 2 pairs, and a single, leaving one cartridge in the strip. The other benefit while carrying is that they are flat in a pocket, less noticeable than a regular speedloader.

The  bad: You need to pay more attention to reloading. This might improve with practice, but I can reload with my eyes closed with speedloaders, not so easy with the strips. Also, you need a little practice, or cartridges go flying.

I need to practice with them some more, but so far they seem to fill the bill.


Quote of the Day – Bad Job Edition

January 8, 2009

First, let us note that if supposedly all-powerful Israel is dedicated to exterminating the Palestinian people, it is doing a very bad job. The Palestinian population has only grown since 1948. There are more Arab citizens living in Israel proper today than there were in all of Palestine the year Israel was founded.

Perhaps one reason Israel fails at genocide is that it isn’t interested in genocide? That would explain why Israel warned thousands of Gazans by cellphone to leave homes near Hamas rocket stockpiles. It would clarify why, even amid all-out war, it offers aid to enemy civilians. It would even illuminate the otherwise mysterious clamor from Israelis for a viable “peace partner.” - Jonah Goldberg


Quote of the Day – Win Edition

January 7, 2009

This is a big deal on several levels. It’s a win for civil rights, it’s a win for the NRA and it’s a win for the residents who will able to have the means to protect themselves.

And it will make Sarah Brady cry.

Win all around. – SnarkyBytes


Audience participation time

January 6, 2009

Idea from a chat with Greg:

You just did someone a BIG favor, and they offered to buy you one gun, and price is no object. This doesn’t affect the rest of your collection, it isn’t the “one gun for the rest of your life,” it is an opportunity to get your one dream gun. Getting it to sell it is not allowed, historic guns are allowed.

In the comments, what is it?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.