Comments on: More thoughts on “Fudds”

By: Jungle Work

Jungle Work — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:43:30 +0000

I think that the term “FUDDs” is a good generic term for Hunters who care nothing about Gun Rights, but are only concerned with the right to hunt and their hunting type of firearms. I’ve heard some say that they don’t care about those guys who have M16s and AK47, those guns are not Sporting Guns. What they don’t realize is that their “Deadly Sniper Rifles” and Assault Semi Auto Shotguns will be taken by those who hate firearms in Citizens hands. I was the one who broached Howie Metzenbaum in the late 80s about the NRA giving up Assault Rifles what was next and without missing a heart beat, he replied, “Those Deadly Sniper Rifles like they killed Jack Kennedy with, you know the one that have periscopes on them.”……

Sad, but that’s the way it is.

Jungle Work

By: Elmer

Elmer — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:07:19 +0000

Always remember…there is ARAT in separate….

By: Peter

Peter — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:49:04 +0000

Also, using the term “Fudds” not only lumps hunters together as turncoats who sell out our rights, it also implies that turncoats who sell out our rights are all (or mostly) hunters, which is simply not true.

By: Peter

Peter — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:39:11 +0000

How about “turncoats who sell out our rights?”

By: Alan

Alan — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:37:45 +0000

OK already. I’ll stop using fudd.

What exactly shall we call the gun owner turncoats who sell out our rights?